|
Animal Communication – Part Two
In continuing with our look into the
differences between animal and human communication, we found that a renowned
researcher conducted a seven-year study on the subject.
The researcher, Dr.
Salee Yasry Eden, after studying three different types of animals, said
that, in their own way, they “are intelligent and civilized individuals with
often refined social behavior.”
In one study with bees, he found
that by flying in certain structures (the bee-dance), honeybees pass on
information to other bees. In this way they inform each other about the
needs of the queen. Like humans, they use their neurological brain system to
communicate.
With birds, the similarity with
human language is more in the structure of the use of the voice. Just like
our language, the meaning of the bird’s language depends on time variation,
rhythm and melodies. Other similarities are that birds learn the language
from their parents. In fact, they even speak in dialects so that birds of
the same species, but from different countries, don’t understand each other.

With the third group, apes,
genetically closest to the human being, Dr. Eden proved that they
communicate just like people, expressing differences in pace, rhythm, melody
and tone. And, again like humans, they can express meaning, and sometimes
entire messages, through their emotions – and they can even read and
interpret signs.
The idea that animals only react
automatically is contradicted by Dr. Eden and many other scientists.
To determine the similarities
between animal and human language is very important, especially when we talk
about cruelty to animals.
|
Τhis
way, we can show that animals have their own values, apart from the value
which humans attach to them – such as pet, involuntary test subject, meat
producer, or protector.
However, too much emphasis on the
similarities can also have negative consequences for the well being of the
animals.
Our language has an advanced
self-consciousness, and the emphasis is on verbal communication and body
language becomes much less important.
If we put the animals in an equal
position we have the risk of only paying attention to the voice and not to
the signals they give with the fur and smell.
Also, certain
behavior can be wrongly interpreted: we may think a dog which yawns is
sleepy, but yawning could also mean that the dog feels stressed. Besides
that, never forget that a dog or cat can not argue logically.
So, it does not make sense to punish a cat who scratched a chair or a
dog that wet the carpet an hour after the fact. The animal will not
understand what you are talking about.

If people want to communicate with
animals it is essential to recognize both the similarities and the
differences between the languages.
Proper education is very important
in this matter. If we have enough knowledge about the body language of
animals, we can certainly “speak” with them and recognize their values!
Animal
communication, and indeed the understanding of the animal world in general,
is a rapidly growing field, and even in the 21st century so far, many prior
understandings related to diverse fields such as personal symbolic name use,
animal emotions, animal culture and learning, and even sexual conduct, long
thought to be well understood, have been revolutionized.
|